DonateNow

 
SEARCH THIS SITE !
Enclose exact phrases in
double quotes ( "...." ) to narrow
your search results.
 


Home Page

Workplace hazards &
ways to eliminate them

Health & safety rights

Where to Get Help

Workers' Compensation

Specific industries and
their hazards

Environmental
contamination including
9 / 11

Immigrant workers and
other vulnerable
communities

Young workers

Women's safety & health

About NYCOSH, who we
are, what we do

Reference library


Health and Safety News

If you would like a free subscription to the biweekly NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health, click here and then click on "send."

Job Listings

Contact the
NYCOSH Staff

Site map

 

 
 

   

Criminal prosecution of employers
who knowingly endanger workers

Campaign to Stop Corporate Killing

 

Documents

Bronx Company Indicted after near Death of Employee: Junkyard Operator Accused of Reckless Endangerment and Environmental Crimes — Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, New York City Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly and State Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Erin Crotty today announced the indictment of a Bronx company for reckless endangerment and environmental crimes following an incident in which an employee nearly died from exposure to toxic vapors. (New York State Department of Law, September 9, 2004)

Rhode Island Law on Criminal Negligence Includes Workplaces (Rhode Island Committee on Occupational Safety and Health, July 2004)

Campaign to Stop Corporate KillingLong prison sentences are supposed to deter crime. However, the penalty for an employer who knowingly kills a worker by violating job safety laws is only six months in jail. Approximately twice a week in the U.S. an employer commits that crime, perhaps because prosecutions are rare and the penalty is so limited. In the last 20 years, fewer than three dozen criminal convictions have sent killer employers to jail. (NYCOSH Safety Rep, June 2004)

New York City Central Labor Council Resolution: Criminal Prosecution of Employers Who Disregard Workplace Safety and Health Regulations Resulting in Death, Serious Injury or Illness (March 2004)



News

Charges Filed in Trench Death: Builder Accused of Knowing Ditch That Collapsed on Worker in 2003 Was UnsafeA well-regarded North Shore builder was charged with manslaughter yesterday in the death of a Mexican laborer who was instantaneously buried nearly two years ago when the unshored trench in which he was told to work collapsed. (Staten Island Advance, November 5, 2005)

Moeves' OSHA History Raises Questions for Parents of Worker Killed in Trench Cave-In When OSHA announced in February that Moeves Plumbing Inc. of Cincinnati had been cited and fined $150,000 for serious and willful violations, it opened old wounds for Jeffrey Walters and Michelle Marts. Two workers already have died while digging trenches for the company, the subject of 13 previous OSHA inspections dating back to 1989. Patrick Walters, the most recent victim and the only son of Marts and Walters, died June 14, 2002, only weeks after OSHA cited the company for willful trenching violations. In 1989, another worker died while working in a trench for the company. (Occupational Hazards, March 22, 2005)

Michigan Construction Company Convicted of 'Willful Criminal Felony Violation' in Landmark Worker Safety CaseLanzo Construction Co. was sentenced to two years' probation in Oakland County's (Michigan) Sixth Circuit Court for an unprecedented Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration-related criminal conviction resulting from a 1999 workplace fatality. (Occupational Hazards.com, January 24, 2005)

Draft Corporate Manslaughter Bill to be Proposed for England and Wales — The U.K. Government announced, in the Queen’s speech on 23rd November 2004, that it intended to publish a draft bill which would introduce a new offence of corporate manslaughter. (UK Trades Union Congress, November 25, 2004)

Those Responsible for Deaths at Work Will Get off Scot-Free — There are criminal sanctions for every other kind of manslaughter, because the authorities understand that fear of the law is what stops us from doing other people in. But, somehow, according to everyone from the CBI to some who have written on these pages, this doesn't apply to company directors. Perhaps they belong to a different species. (Guardian, October 5, 2004)

Prosecutor to Review Fatal Crane Collapse: Criminal Charges a Possible Outcome — The federal investigation into a deadly crane collapse during construction on the new I-280 bridge has been turned over to the Lucas County prosecutor's office for possible criminal charges. Prosecutor Julia Bates yesterday confirmed her office has been reviewing documents compiled by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration into the Feb. 16 collapse that killed four men and injured four others. (Toledo Blade, July 30, 2004)

Plea Agreement Is Reached in Pipe Case — A day after announcing a second indictment against McWane Inc., federal prosecutors disclosed Wednesday that a longtime McWane manager had agreed to cooperate with their investigation into environmental and safety violations at McWane, one of the nation's largest manufacturers of cast iron water and sewer pipe. (New York Times, May 27, 2004)

Justice Dept. Drops Most Criminal OSHA Referrals — Critics in Congress and elsewhere have been hammering OSHA ever since a recent New York Times article revealed that over the past 20 years, the agency failed to seek criminal prosecution against 93 percent of the companies whose willful violations of safety rules caused workers to die. Even if OSHA referred more cases to the Department of Justice (DOJ) however, it appears unlikely that many more employers would face the kind of criminal liability that victims' families and OSHA critics believe is a requisite for justice. Put simply, the vast majority of cases OSHA does refer to DOJ are never prosecuted. While efforts to hold employers criminally responsible for workplace fatalities have targeted OSHA enforcement, it is the Department of Justice that must prosecute employers. This is the first in a series of articles that will examine the factors impeding DOJ from criminal prosecution of OSHA cases. (Occupational Hazards.com, February 25, 2004)

Contractor Jailed for 3½-10½ Years for Killing Five Workers in Scaffold Collapse — Sentencing judge says the case had given her an education in how "astonishingly ineffectual" the federal government has been in protecting workers' lives. (January 2004)

New Canadian Criminal Law to Enforce Worker Safety — Safety concerns were raised about the Westray coal mine in Nova Scotia in 1991, even before it opened. The most salient warnings – that coal dust and gas were building up – were ignored. And then, in 1992, a spark more than a kilometer below the earth ignited methane gas, causing a huge explosion that killed 26 miners. Two onsite managers were charged, but the charges were dropped in 1998. There was no law holding senior company executives criminally responsible for ignoring safety warnings. Fast forward to 2003. The law forces employers, under penalty of criminal charges and jail time, to take reasonable steps to protect workers from injury and death. Bill C-45 was passed in Parliament before it recessed in November and given Royal Assent in Halifax in a ceremony that included family members of the Westray miners. (Health and Safety Report, December 2003)

Farm Death Sparks Manslaughter Charge — Yolo County prosecutors have filed what is believed to be the California's first involuntary manslaughter case against a grower in the death of a farm worker who was killed on the job. The case was filed against a Woodland-area grower who is facing four years in prison and $650,000 in fines if he is convicted on all three counts in the landmark case. Deputy District Attorney Kyle Hedum said the filing is "quite rare, but it's going to be more and more common" -- due to a statute that elevates to a potential felony any serious Labor Code violation that results in a worker's death. Another four farm worker deaths in the Central Valley and Northern California are under investigation, according to Hedum, a staff lawyer with the California District Attorney's Association who is working as a "circuit rider" for the agency, helping 34 counties investigate agricultural as well as industrial fatalities. "These guys have been getting killed left and right up here for the last 20 years," Hedum said. "The more I'm out here, the more I'm going to hear about these things." (Sacramento Bee, December 18, 2001)

EPA/OSHA Alliance Increases the Danger of Criminal Liability for Employers — The criminal prosecution of occupational exposure cases under RCRA's knowing endangerment provision results from two independent, yet interrelated policies. First, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and the Occupational Safety & Health Administration ("OSHA") have forged an alliance by entering into two formal agreements which are referred to as memorandums of understanding ("MOU") by the agencies. (Environmental Law Alert, August 2000)


Organizations

Campaign to Stop Corporate Killing (National Council for Occupational Safety and Health)
Centre for Corporate Accountability (U.K.)
New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
Philadelphia Project on Occupational Safety and Health
Western New York Council on Occupatiopnal Safety and Health

 
Disclaimer

DonateNow